IHAP Newsletter 6.1 Summer 2020
> Roundtable: Remembering Hiroshima and Nagasaki at 75 – How has the legacy of the U.S. atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki taken on diverse meanings in different contexts over time? What is the role of the narratives of the Hibakusha – the Japanese word for the survivors of the two nuclear attacks – in re-framing a predominant “ends justify the means” rationale for the bombings? The contributors of this roundtable come together to both reflect on the humanitarian toll of the bombs, and look to how meaning of them was contested over time both in the U.S. and internationally.
> Contributors: Toshihiro Higuchi, Georgetown University; Lisa Langdon Koch, Claremont McKenna College; Sidra Hamidi, Stetson University; Rebecca Davis Gibbons, University of Southern Maine
IHAP Newsletter 5.1 Summer 2019
> Roundtable: On the Centenary of Versailles — What are the primary historical legacies of the Paris Peace Conference? What lessons do the construction, successes, and failures of the Versailles Treaty framework hold for contemporary international politics? The contributors to this roundtable cast a critical eye on the attempt to erect a postwar international settlement at Versailles, 1919.
> Contributors: Molly Cochran, Oxford Brookes University; Laura Robson, Portland State University; Sandra Fahy, Sophia University and Harvard Law School; Peter Harris, Colorado State University; Tuomas Forsberg, University of Helsinki; Jeremy Smith, University of Eastern Finland; and Jane Cowan, University of Sussex.
IHAP Newsletter 4.2 Spring 2019
> Review Roundtable of The Internationalists: How a Radical Plan to Outlaw War Remade the World by Oona Hathaway and Scott Shapiro (New York: Simon and Schuster, 2017). — Six experts on international law, politics, and organization review Hathaway and Shapiro’s argument about the pivot role of international law as a cause of peace among states.
> Contributors: Karen J. Alter, Northwestern University; Michelle Allendoerfer, George Washington University; Ghadeer Awwad, Georgetown University; Hyeyoon Park, Colorado State University; John G. Oates, Florida International University; James D. Morrow, University of Michigan.
IHAP Newsletter 4.1 Summer 2018
> Roundtable: The Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty at 50 — How successful has the international nuclear non-proliferation regime been over the past five decades? What is the future of the norms on non-proliferation and non-use? What can international history tell us about the current international politics concerning North Korea and Iran? This roundtable brings together International Relations scholars, policy experts, and anti-nuclear weapons activists to discuss these questions and more.
> Contributors: Tomoko Watanabe, ANT-Hiroshima; Lisa Langdon Koch, Claremont McKenna College; Naoko Aoki, University of Maryland-College Park; Wilfred Wan, UN Institute for Disarmament Research; Etel Solingen, University of California-Irvine.
> Interviews: Catherine Lu, McGill University; Brendan Green, University of Cincinnati.
IHAP Newsletter 3.2 Spring 2018
> Roundtable: IR Theory Across Time and Space — Do IR theories suffer from “Eurocentric” biases and, if so, what should be done? What does it mean to “globalize” the discipline? This roundtable discussion brings together an international group of scholars to discuss the applicability of the discipline’s main theoretical paradigms across time and space.
> Contributors: Pinar Bilgin, Bilkent University; May Darwich, Durham University; Graham F. Odell, Chapman University; David C. Kang, University of Southern California.
> Interviews: Rosella Cappella Zielinski, Boston University; Lisa Blaydes, Stanford University; Christopher Paik, NYU-Abu Dhabi.
IHAP Newsletter 3.1 Summer 2017
> Roundtable: Leaders in International Politics, Past and Present — How should scholars of international politics go about the study of leaders and leadership? What are the various theoretical approaches on offer, and what are the cutting-edge methodological approaches? In this roundtable, contributors draw upon their own scholarship to offer useful techniques for uncovering how individual agents “make politics” and “make history.”
> Contributors: Robert Jervis, Columbia University; Juliet Kaarbo, University of Edinburgh; Adriana Boersner, University of Missouri; Cali Mortenson Ellis, The Evergreen State College; Mark Ledwidge, Canterbury Christ Church University.
IHAP Newsletter 2.2 Winter 2017
> Roundtable: Historical Parallels: 2016 — This roundtable asks to what extent the most dramatic political developments of 2016 (the “Brexit” referendum and the political rise of Donald Trump, for example) can be said to mirror past events. Contributors analyze the growing salience of “populist” movements and candidates; the apparent “crisis” of political legitimacy in Western societies; anti-immigration sentiment; and the mass politics of disintegration.
> Contributors: Deborah Boucoyannis, University of Virginia; Thomas Pepinsky, Cornell University; Margaret E. Peters, UCLA; Stefanie Walter, University of Zurich.
> Interviews: Andrew Phillips, University of Queensland; Jason Sharman University of Cambridge; Ronald R. Krebs, University of Minnesota.
IHAP Newsletter 2.1 Summer 2016
> Roundtable: Women in International History and Politics — Why are women silenced in international history and politics? What methodological tools and theoretical approaches can be used to amplify women’s voices and shed light on women’s experiences and political agency? This roundtable provides new insights into the extent of the gender imbalance affecting the study of international history and offers practical guidance for improving future research.
> Contributors: Karen Alter, Northwestern University; Swati Srivastava, Northwestern University; Glenda Sluga, University of Sydney; Anwar Mhajne, University of Cincinnati; Catia C. Confortini, Wellesley College.
>Interviews: Eric Grynaviski, George Washington University; Nicholas L. Miller, Brown University.
IHAP Newsletter 1.2 Winter 2016
> Roundtable: Debating DA-RT: This roundtable addresses the idea of Data Access-Research Transparency in political science, with contributors evaluating the relative merits and pitfalls of DA-RT policies for the discipline’s journals. Will greater transparency about data and methods make political science scholarship more reliable, accessible, and robust? Or do DA-RT policies place an inordinate and misplaced burden on researchers? Participants in this forum discuss these and other questions.
> Contributors: Jelena Subotic, Georgia State University; Eric Grynaviski, George Washington University; Giovanni Capoccia, University of Oxford; Karen Alter, Northwestern University; James Ashley Morrison, LSE)
> Friendly Fire: DA-RT: In this “friendly fire” scholarly exchange, a leading proponent of DA-RT policies debates a scholar and editor skeptical about the implementation of DA-RT.
> Contributors: Andrew Moravcsik, Princeton University; Jeffrey C. Isaac, Indiana University.
IHAP Newsletter 1.1 Summer 2015
> Roundtable: International History and Reconceptualizing Empire — How should scholars of international history and politics conceptualize empire, both in its historical forms and its contemporary manifestations? The contributions to this roundtable analyze the political development and historical legacies of the Ottoman Empire; the political economy of decolonization; and the wider need for serious a reconceptualization of “empire” as an analytical category.
> Contributors: Burak Kadercan, United States Naval War College; Jeff D. Colgan, Brown University; Ayşe Zarakol, University of Cambridge.