This page includes links to recently published scholarship from across various subfields of political science and other areas of social scientific inquiry, as well as Working Papers, essays, symposia, and other resources.
“Symposium: Teaching Interpretive Methods” Qualitative & Multi-Method Research 7, 1 (Spring 2009)
Bibliography: Interpretive Approaches in Public Policy and Public Administration, Dvora Yanow and Peregrine Schwartz-Shea. From the NSF Workshop on Interpretive Methodologies in Political Science, 1-2 September 2009
Interpretive Political Science – Readings by Subfield, Peregrine Schwartz-Shea and Dvora Yanow (rev. 2015)
Dvora Yanow, “Interpretive Empirical Political Science: What Makes This Not a Subfield of Qualitative Methods.” Qualitative Methods Newsletter 1 (2) (Fall 2003): 9-13.
Responding to data-sharing and other challenges concerning field research materials (e.g. interview transcripts, fieldnotes, and the like)
Harper, Robin A. 2018. “Thinking about Journals, IRBs, and Research Partners (Interviewees).” Excerpt from a paper presented at the roundtable “Will the real ‘research ethics’ stand up? IRBs, DA-RT, QTD, and the APSA Ethics Guide in the age of Trump,” Western Political Science Association Annual Meeting (San Francisco, March 29-31).
Knott, Eleanor. 2019. “Beyond the Field: Ethics after Fieldwork in Politically Dynamic Contexts.” Perspectives on Politics 17/1: 140-53.
Krystalli, Roxani. 2018. “Negotiating Data Management with the National Science Foundation: Transparency and Ethics in Research Relationships.” Memo.
Tripp, Aili Mari. 2018. “Transparency and Integrity in Conducting Field Research on Politics in Challenging Contexts.” Perspectives on Politics 16 (3): 728-38.
6. Timothy Pachirat, Among Wolves: Ethnography and the Immersive Study of Power (2018)
5. Lee Ann Fujii, Interviewing in Social Science Research: A Relational Approach (2018)
4. Frederic Charles Schaffer, Elucidating Social Science Concepts (2016)
3. Shaul Shenhav, Analyzing Social Narratives (2015)
2. Cecelia Lynch, Interpreting International Politics (2014)
1. Peregrine Schwartz-Shea and Dvora Yanow, Interpretive Research Design (2012)
Fred Schaffer, “Thin Descriptions: The Limits of Survey Research on the Meaning of Democracy” Political Concepts Committee on Concepts and Methods Working Paper Series. No. 45 (November 2010). Published in Polity 46:3 (2014): 303-330.
Lee Ann Fujii (2017), “The Prehistory of the Muslim Ban,” Public Books
Lee Ann Fujii (2017), “The Real Problem with Diversity in Political Science,” Duck of Minerva
Nick Cheesman (2018), “Rule-of-Law Ethnography.” Annual Review of Law and Social Science 14: 167-84.
Samantha Majic (2019), “Publicizing the (In)visible? Celebrities, Anti-Human Trafficking Activism, and Feminist Ideologies.” Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society jxz040.
Anastasia Shesterinina (2021), Mobilizing in Uncertainty: Collective Identities and War in Abkhazia, Cornell University Press. See too the book launch video.
Interpretation, Method and Critique (IMC) Network and Research Cluster, Australian National University
Our colleagues April Biccum and Nick Cheesman at ANU have created a new group focusing on interpretive work. The IMC is a joint initiative of the School of Politics and International Relations and the Department of Political and Social Change in the Coral Bell School of the College of Asia and the Pacific, at ANU (Canberra).